Issues : Errors in GE
b. 228-229
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The lack of three subsequent slurs in the L.H. part is almost certainly an oversight of the engraver of GE1 (→GE2). A slur in the bottom voice in bar 229 was added in GE3 after analogy with adjacent bars. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 230
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The version of GE most probably resulted from an oversight of the engraver of GE1 – cf. analogous bar 249. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||||||
b. 244-245
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
According to us, the hairpin in bar 245 was placed in the sources on the wrong side of the bar line. It is indicated by the mark in the next, analogous phrase, appearing earlier, at the end of the first bar of the phrase. Such subsequent, short marks are most probably meant to indicate gentle long accents, hence their accurate placement is essential for the correct interpretation of their meaning. Taking that into account, in the main text we move the mark to under the last triplet in bar 244, after the mark in bar 246, which, according to us, interacts better with the remaining hairpins and accents in bars 244-247. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins , Errors in GE |
|||||||||
b. 254
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The missing in GE seems to be an oversight of the engraver of GE1. However, performing this highly spectacular passage in dynamics is quite an uncommon effect, so that one can ponder whether the mark was not put in FE by mistake, e.g. instead of in bar 256, in which it was then added. Therefore, it would be an example of unfinished proofreading. (Cf. bar 248, in which a purely virtuoso element – scale in an interval of sixth – is dynamically distinguished between in bar 244 and leggierissimo in bar 250). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||||||
b. 272-273
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The missing mark does not have to be considered a mistake – such a notation is to be found on several occasions in Chopin's pieces (e.g. in the autograph of the Etude in D Major, Op. 25 No. 8, bars 19-20). The marks we suggest are the earliest and latest possible – due to harmonic reasons – moments of pedal release. It was already EE that considered the notation of FE to be inaccurate; in turn, an additional omission of the mark is probably a mistake of GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Errors in GE , No pedal release mark |