Issues : Errors in GE
b. 204
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In the 1st half of the bar, FE has different slurs for the R.H. and for the L.H. We unify them in the main text by changing the slur in the L.H. after the slur in the R.H. A similar change was introduced in EE and GE3; in turn, the missing slur in the L.H. in GE1 (→GE2) is almost certainly a mistake. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||
b. 208-209
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
A later beginning of the mark in GE1 (→GE2) must be an inaccuracy resulting from having divided these bars into two great staves. GE3 prolonged the mark yet did not repeat its range from FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies |
|||||||
b. 212
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The missing accent in GE is probably an oversight of the engraver of GE1, although the mark could have also been added only just in the last proofreading of FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||||
b. 214
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||
b. 228-229
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The missing staccato wedges in GE most probably result from distraction of the engraver of GE1 – he overlooked also three slurs in this bar as well as a note in bar 230. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |