![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : GE revisions
b. 469-470
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
Just like in bar 462, the missing slur must be an oversight; the slur was added only in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
|||||||
b. 471
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
|||||||
b. 474-475
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The significantly shorter category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins , GE revisions |
|||||||
b. 475
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The missing accent does not have to be considered an oversight in this case – cf. the twin phrases of this three-part progression (bars 473 and 477). Therefore, in the main text we suggest a long accent in accordance with the interpretation adopted in the mentioned bars. An accent (short) was added in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Long accents , GE revisions |
|||||||
b. 478
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
It is difficult to assume that Chopin would have liked to embrace with a slur only one triplet in this bar. The notation of [A] was most probably unclear (e.g. due to crossings-out) or a misunderstanding occurred at the time of proofreading. The slur of GE1 (→GE2) is most probably an erroneously shifted slur of FE, while its omission in GE3 was probably meant to eliminate the clearly erroneous mark. According to us, the presence of the slur in FE proves that Chopin did not intend to introduce subtler articulation effects; therefore, in the main text we prolong the slur of FE so that it encompasses the entire passage. An additional argument supporting the validity of such a solution are numerous examples of prolonged slurs in the proofreading of FE, e.g. in bar 493 or 496. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |