![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Errors in FE
b. 101
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The missing staccato marks in the 1st half of the bar in FE must be an oversight, completed both in GE and EE. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 177
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
There are no accidentals before the 3rd quaver in FE (→EE,GE1→GE2), so that the notes should be interpreted as d category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 179
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In FE (→EE), there are no accidentals before the first chord. Therefore, the middle note should be interpreted as d category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors repeated in EE |
|||||
b. 181
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In FE, there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals |
|||||
b. 186
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In FE (→EE), the only accidental before the 1st chord of the 2nd half of the bar is a category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in EE |