Issues : GE revisions
|
b. 228-229
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The lack of three subsequent slurs in the L.H. part is almost certainly an oversight of the engraver of GE1 (→GE2). A slur in the bottom voice in bar 229 was added in GE3 after analogy with adjacent bars. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 230
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
We consider the version of FE (→GE1→GE2) to be erroneous due to the reasons mentioned in a very similar situation in bar 225. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 231
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In FE (→GE1→GE2), the last note in the R.H. is a crotchet, which is a mistake rectified in EE and GE3. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Errors repeated in GE |
||||||
|
b. 232
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
We add a cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 233-235
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The version of GE3, in which the first quaver of the top voice in bars 233 and 235 is c3, was created almost 10 years after Chopin's death. The reason for the revision was probably the presence of c2 two quavers later. Moreover, it is the missing necessary category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
before a2 in the main text. The accidental was added already in 
3 in 