Slurs
|
b. 464-465
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
We consider the shorter slur in bar 465 to be inaccurate, on the basis of comparison with similar motifs, and we prolong it in the main text after bar 464. In GE3, both slurs were changed to those present in the sources in analogous bars 456-457. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 468
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The shorter slur in GE must have been an arbitrary decision, perhaps resulting from a comparison with analogous bar 460. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 469-470
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
Just like in bar 462, the missing slur must be an oversight; the slur was added only in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 470-471
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
Shorter slurs than in analogous bars 458-459, 462-463 and 466-467 must be an inaccuracy, hence in the main text we give slurs encompassing entire little passages. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 471-472
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
A comparison with analogous bars 463-464 points to a high likelihood of the ending of the slur having been inaccurately reproduced in the sources. In the referred situation, two slurs combine the e1-g category imprint: Editorial revisions |
1 third with the preceding passage, in spite of the change of dynamics that emphasises the beginning of the eight-bar section. See also bars 