Issues : EE revisions
|
b. 237-239
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In bars 237 and 239, we add cautionary sharps before f category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 238
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
We add a cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 239
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
FE (→GE1→GE2) is missing an accidental before the topmost note. A comparison with identical bar 237 proves an unquestionable oversight. A natural was added in EE, GE3 and FEH. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals |
|||||
|
b. 241
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 244
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
It is highly likely that it was the reviser of EE that guessed Chopin's intention – it is not always easy to distinguish wedges from dots in autographs; engravers often had problems with their recognition. The wedge in the L.H. and the compliant wedges in similar situations two and four bars later support the mistake of FE (→GE). On the other hand, the discussed place shows a number of essential differences with respect to bars 246 and 248 – a single note and not an octave in the R.H., different preceding music, presence of category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Wedges |
2 in the main text. The accidentals were added already in 
before d
before b2 in the main text. The former was added in 
. Due to this reason, in the main text we leave the dot featured in the principal source.