data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
We present circumstantial evidence on the basis of which the notation of FE with a staccato dot on the 2nd quaver only of each of these bars should be respected:
- compliant notation in both bars;
- proofreading of articulation of the theme in the solo part in bars 17 and 29 – according to us, the original slurs prove that the 2nd quaver, together with the following accented crotchet, creates a micro-motif and should be emphasised as an element initiating a new act of energy;
- wedges in violin I in FEorch (→GEorch) in bars 112-113. Those bars are not fully analogous to the discussed ones; however, the notation confirms the distinct articulation of the second quavers and their initial nature within the micro-motifs of the theme.
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: GE revisions
notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Back to note