mUltimate Chopin

Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Page: 
Source: 
p. 6, b. 78-91
p. 1, b. 1-24
p. 2, b. 25-39
p. 3, b. 40-50
p. 4, b. 51-62
p. 5, b. 63-77
p. 6, b. 78-91
p. 7, b. 92-103
p. 8, b. 104-113
p. 9, b. 114-126
Main text
Main text
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FED - First French edition
FEFo - Forest copy
FEH - Hartmann copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Corrected impression of GE1
GE2a - Altered impression of GE2
GE3 - Second German edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FED - First French edition
FEFo - Forest copy
FEH - Hartmann copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Corrected impression of GE1
GE2a - Altered impression of GE2
GE3 - Second German edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text

  b. 90

 in FE (→EE)

No sign in GE

The missing  hairpin is probably an oversight of the engraver of GE. There is also a possibility that Chopin added the marking in the last phase of proofreading of FE (→EE).

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE

notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

Missing markers on sources: FE1, FES, FED, FEJ, FEH, GE1, GE2, GE3, EE3, EE1, EE2, FEFo, GE2a
Complete ➔