![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : EE revisions
b. 51
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
In this context, the missing slurs must be considered an inaccuracy; therefore, in the main text we add them after the previous bar and analogous bar 100. Such additions were introduced already in GE3. In turn, the slurs added in EE, unjustified by the accompaniment structure, cannot be authentic. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 53
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
The differences in the notation of the f category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 53
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
The literally reproduced notation of FE must be considered inaccurate if the rhythmic values in the 2nd half of the bar are correct (we omit the issue of the f category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 57
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
The 1st finger added next to the d category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in GE |
|||||||||||
b. 57
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
Like in analogous bar 16, the arpeggio in EE is most probably an arbitrary addition of the reviser. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |