Issues : GE revisions

b. 49

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II

Slur in FE (→EE) & GE3

No slur in GE1 (→GE2)

..

The missing slur probably stems from inattention of the engraver of GE1, although it cannot be excluded that Chopin added this slur only in the last proofreading of FE (→EE).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions

b. 49

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II

..

In FE (→GE1GE2), there is no accidental before the 4th demisemiquaver before last. The missing  must be a mistake in this context, probably repeated after [A], since such inaccuracies in the notation of accidentals are typical of Chopin. The sharp was added in EE and in GE3; in the latter, another defect of Chopin's notation was removed – the unnecessarily repeated  before ain the 3rd group of semiquavers. The sharp in the discussed place could have been added in FEH – see the adjacent note. 

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals , Omission of current key accidentals , Last key signature sign , Errors repeated in GE

b. 50

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II

No pedalling in FE (→EE,GE1GE2)

 in GE3

[ suggested by the editors

..

In the main text, we suggest completing the pedalling after analogous bar 99. In this context, so typical of Chopin, omission of pedalling marks must be considered an inaccuracy. The pedalling was completed already in GE3. See also bar 52.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: GE revisions

b. 50

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II

..

In GE1 (→GE2), the last tie of bis missing. It is a patent mistake, most probably an oversight. The mark was added in GE3.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions

b. 51

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II

No slurs in FE (→GE1GE2)

3-note slurs in EE

4-note slurs in GE3

..

In this context, the missing slurs must be considered an inaccuracy; therefore, in the main text we add them after the previous bar and analogous bar 100. Such additions were introduced already in GE3. In turn, the slurs added in EE, unjustified by the accompaniment structure, cannot be authentic.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions