![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Inaccuracies in FE
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next »
b. 76-77
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
The pedalling of FE seems to be incomplete – there is no musical justification for omitting the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE , No pedal release mark |
|||||
b. 77
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
In FE, there is one mark before the 7th quaver, a
category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 86
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
The sources differ in the notation of the accidentals in the 2nd half of the bar; however, none of them includes a manifest error. In relation to the notation adopted in the main text (note number in brackets):
Above all, the differences result from different conventions of validity of the marks next to the notes that are included or not included by an octave sign. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 88-90
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
In FE, there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , Omission of current key accidentals , Last key signature sign |
|||||
b. 91
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
The rhythmic division of the 4th beat of the bar is not certain in FE – the digit '5' is put over the fourth semiquaver (in the group of five). The correct digit was either inaccurately placed (the '5' describing the quintuplet should be over the 3rd note) or the engraver inserted the '5' by mistake instead of a '3' marking the last three semiquavers as a triplet. None of the pupils' copies includes hints on rhythm. In the main text, we adopt the first possibility, based on an assumption that the notation of FE, although inaccurate, does not contain a mistake. The version with quintuplet, written unambiguously, is present in GE and EE. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next »