![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Terzverschreibung error
b. 34
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE, one can see that the last quaver in the top voice was originally a c2. The proofreading restored the version of Atut. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Terzverschreibung error , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 143
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The 3rd and 4th semiquavers of the bar were originally written in FE a third lower. The traces of corrections of this mistake are clearly visible in the copies of FE. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Terzverschreibung error , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 195
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
There is no indication that the version of GE could be possibly authentic; it is most probably a typical example of the Terzverschreibung error. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Terzverschreibung error |
|||||
b. 227
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE, it was initially f category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Terzverschreibung error , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 251
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
There is no indication that the version of GE could be possibly authentic – a comparison with analogous bars 227, 235 and 586 proves that it must be an example of a Terzverschreibung error. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Terzverschreibung error |