Issues : Authentic corrections of FE
b. 34
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE, one can see that the last quaver in the top voice was originally a c2. The proofreading restored the version of Atut. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Terzverschreibung error , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 39-40
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The version of FEpiano (→GE,EE), closer to the orchestral part written in FEorch, was introduced by Chopin in the proofreading of FE in place of the original version of Atut. See also bar 42. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 42
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The g1 (in the 1st quaver) and g2 (in the second one) notes were added in the proofreading of FE (→#GE,EE), most probably by Chopin. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 61
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
Chopin would gradually shape the notation of the R.H. part in the first half of this bar. Initially, he tried to write down the "harmonic legato" – holding the elements of the chord constituting the figuration with fingers – through rhythmic values: or . It was still in Atut that the notation was simplified and the notes that were supposed to be held were marked with the legato indication. In the proofreading of FE (→GE,EE), the composer introduced the maximally transparent, two-part notation and changed legato to legatiss. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Corrections in A , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 61
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |