data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
In bars 550-556, such markings as accents or arpeggios appear in FE quite irregularly. A comparison with analogous fragment of exposition (bars 195-201) allows us to consider those irregularities to be most likely accidental inaccuracies, since analogous markings do appear there. Due to this reason, in the main text we suggest respective additions:
- accent and arpeggio in bar 550,
- accent over g
2 in bar 551,
- arpeggio in bar 552,
- accent in bar 554,
- arpeggio in bar 556 (by analogy with bar 197).
In turn, we do not add slurs in the L.H. in bars 551-552 and 555-556, since none of those places feature a similar slur. We also leave the minim chord in bar 556 without accent, since continuation in bar 557 and further is different than in exposition – rests in the L.H. part and no virtuoso con fuoco passages like in bars 203-210.
category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions
issues: EE revisions
notation: Ornaments
Back to note