Issues : Inaccuracies in FE
|
b. 6
|
composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major
..
Chopin introduced a number of changes when correcting FE, also in performance markings. Here, however, it is almost certain that the hairpin was accidentally reversed by the engraver. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Sign reversal |
||||||||
|
b. 10-11
|
composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major
..
The slurs and ties of A, unambiguous in their meaning and extent, became somewhat distorted in the editions. In GE, due to the fact that bar 10 marked the beginning of a new line of text, the tie sustaining f2 had to be divided into two parts; although the part from bar 10 was accidentally omitted, the meaning of the curved lines printed in bars 9-10 remained unchanged and easy to guess. In FE (→EE), the earlier commenced slur seems to be a continuation of the tie from bar 9, which definitely suggests a change of meaning. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in GE |
||||||||
|
b. 14
|
composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||||
|
b. 16
|
composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major
..
The tight spacing in GE seems to be the reason for increasing inaccuracies in the extent of the hairpins category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies |
||||||||
|
b. 17
|
composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major
..
The small differences between the sources are purely graphic in nature and their practical aspect is negligible. For the edited text we use the notation taken from A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE |
in 
in 
