Page: 
Source: 
p. 16, b. 214-226
p. 1, b. 1-27
p. 2, b. 28-40
p. 3, b. 41-54
p. 4, b. 55-69
p. 5, b. 70-84
p. 6, b. 85-97
p. 7, b. 98-110
p. 8, b. 111-125
p. 9, b. 126-138
p. 10, b. 139-148
p. 11, b. 149-159
p. 12, b. 160-173
p. 13, b. 174-187
p. 14, b. 188-201
p. 15, b. 202-213
p. 16, b. 214-226
p. 17, b. 227-238
p. 18, b. 239-252
p. 19, b. 253-264
p. 20, b. 265-279
Main text
Main text
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FED - Dubois copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE1a - Retouched impression of GE1
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Corrected impression of GE2
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Changed impression of EE1
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FED - Dubois copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE1a - Retouched impression of GE1
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Corrected impression of GE2
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Changed impression of EE1
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 224

No mark in FE (→GE,EE)

Accent suggested by the editors

In the main text we suggest adding an accent at the beginning of this bar. The accent is present in all three repetitions of this bar (in b. 228, 244 and 248), and, according to us, it is the composer's inadvertence or a mistake of the engraver of FE that are the most likely reasons for the absence of an accent in the discussed bar.

See b. 223

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Editorial revisions

issues:

notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

Missing markers on sources: EE2, EE1, FE1, FED, GE1, GE1a, GE2, GE3