Page: 
Source: 
p. 3, b. 41-54
p. 1, b. 1-27
p. 2, b. 28-40
p. 3, b. 41-54
p. 4, b. 55-69
p. 5, b. 70-84
p. 6, b. 85-97
p. 7, b. 98-110
p. 8, b. 111-125
p. 9, b. 126-138
p. 10, b. 139-148
p. 11, b. 149-159
p. 12, b. 160-173
p. 13, b. 174-187
p. 14, b. 188-201
p. 15, b. 202-213
p. 16, b. 214-226
p. 17, b. 227-238
p. 18, b. 239-252
p. 19, b. 253-264
p. 20, b. 265-279
Main text
Main text
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FED - Dubois copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE1a - Retouched impression of GE1
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Corrected impression of GE2
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Changed impression of EE1
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FED - Dubois copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE1a - Retouched impression of GE1
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Corrected impression of GE2
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Changed impression of EE1
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 43

Wedge on b1 in FE

No marks in GE

2 wedges in EE

The missing wedge next to b1 is most probably an oversight of the engraver in GE. In the main text we add a wedge next to b2, which was already performed in EE (also in b. 187). The absence of this mark must be considered inadvertence, since there is no doubt that all three motifs should be performed alike.

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions, Errors in GE

notation: Pitch

Missing markers on sources: EE2, EE1, FE1, FED, GE1, GE1a, GE2, GE3