mUltimate Chopin

Op. 22, Polonaise

Text Compare Notes Sources Description

Issues : Errors repeated in EE

b. 232

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

..

The flat restoring b2 at the beginning of the last triplet does not appear in any of the sources. It seems that it was believed that the  before b3 four semiquavers earlier was not a cautionary accidental only and that it was also valid in the case of the discussed note. The same in b. 252.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions

issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in EE

b. 237

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

..

In FE (→GE), there is no  restoring g2 on the 8th semiquaver. The patent mistake was corrected in EE. In addition, none of the sources includes the  restoring b2 on the 15th semiquaver.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in EE

b. 252

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

..

Just like in b. 232, all sources are lacking in the  restoring b2 at the beginning of the last triplet. 

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions

issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in EE

b. 264

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

..

The notation of the last two quavers is inaccurate in the sources, since Chopin most probably considered the manner in which he wrote the chord on the 4th quaver of the bar – c1-f1-a1-e2-a2 – to be sufficient in order to mark the return to the main key of E major. Consequently, there is no accidental before the chord on the 5th quaver in FE (→EE,GE1→GE2), while the last quaver is lacking in the  restoring B. On the other hand, all sources contain cautionary naturals before d2-d3 in the last R.H. chord, unnecessary if we assume that the preceding chord was interpreted correctly. A revision of this notation was performed only in GE3, and then incomplete, since it was only the  restoring b that was added. In the main text we add both necessary flats (restoring b and B); we also add 3 cautionary accidentals –  of g1 and the flats of b1-b2. 

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Errors in FE , Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in EE

b. 268

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

..

The second half of the bar is written in the sources even more carelessly than in b. 264. In FE (→GE1), there is no  before a3 on the 4th quaver of the bar; the  restoring a3 in the last chord is also missing. These accidentals were added in EE and GE2 (→GE3). Moreover, FE (→GE1,EE) are lacking in the flats restoring b1 and b in the last two L.H. quavers. The mistake was partially corrected – only on the 5th quaver of the bar – only in GE2 (→GE3). See also the preceding note.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Accidentals in different octaves , Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in EE