![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : EE revisions
b. 197-198
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
Similarly as in b. 53-54, of which the discussed bars are a literal repetition, in the main text we suggest a [ category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions |
||||||
b. 201
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
Just like in b. 57, the version of EE is most probably the initial one, changed in FE (→GE) in the last stage of proofreading, yet a revision of EE cannot be entirely ruled out. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
b. 201
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
Just like in b. 57, we consider the missing slur over the accompanying L.H. figure to be Chopin's oversight. The slur was also added in EE. See the next note. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions |
||||||
b. 203-204
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
Just like in b. 59-60, EE are lacking in both flats lowering d2 to d category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors repeated in EE |
||||||
b. 206
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
Like in b. 62, of which this bar is a literal repetition, there are no accidentals before the 1st, 3rd and 6th notes under the octave sign in FE (→GE1). In the main text we add respective accidentals – category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |