Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 73-74

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

Horizontal accents in FE (→GE)

Vertical accents in EE

..

Arbitrary changes of accents to vertical ones are typical of EE – cf. b. 47-50

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions

b. 74

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

2 slurs in FE (→GE,EE)

1 slur suggested by the editors

..

The change of the slurring scheme, which distorts the natural pianistic gesture, is inconceivable in such a virtuoso sequence. Due to this reason, in the main text we correct the undoubtedly erroneous slurs of the sources. A similar situation can be found in b. 218.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

issues: Errors in FE

b. 75-76

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

..

In FE (→GE) the slur started in b. 75, the last on the page, has no ending in b. 76. The inaccuracy was corrected in EE.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , Uncertain slur continuation , Errors repeated in GE

b. 75

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

..

The sources are lacking in the  raising b to b, which is a patent inaccuracy. The same in b. 219.

category imprint: Interpretations within context

issues: Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in EE

b. 76

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

..

In FE the dyad of the bottom voice (e1-a1) is a crotchet. The patent mistake was corrected both in GE and EE. The same in b. 220.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Rhythmic errors