Page: 
Source: 
p. 5, b. 67-96
p. 1, b. 1-17
p. 2, b. 18-33
p. 3, b. 34-49
p. 4, b. 50-66
p. 5, b. 67-96
p. 6, b. 97-114
FE1 - First French edition
Main text
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FED - Dubois copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE1a - Retouched impression of GE1
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Corrected impression of GE2
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FED - Dubois copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE1a - Retouched impression of GE1
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Corrected impression of GE2
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF FE1 - First French edition


  b. 74-86

3 shorter, 1 longer slur in FE

4 shorter slurs in GE

3 longer slurs, 1 shorter in EE

4 longer slurs suggested by the editors

In b. 74, 75, 77 and 86 the slurs over the L.H. part in FE are thrice led to the last quaver (d1 or b) and only once – in b. 75 – to the crotchet ending the motif. According to us, it is probably an inaccuracy, and the slurs should always reach the last note, like in the R.H. In GE the slurs were unified by shortening the one in b. 75; it may be an inaccuracy. In turn, in EE the slur in b. 74 was extended (the range of the slur in b. 86 is vague).

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions, Inaccuracies in GE

notation: Slurs

Missing markers on sources: GE1, GE1a, GE2, GE3, FE1, FED, EE1, EE2