![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : GE revisions
b. 39
|
composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato
..
It is unclear how 7 R.H. semiquavers should be grouped, according to Chopin. According to us, the grouping indicated by Chopin in analogous b. 15 is the most likely; a corresponding digit was added in GE. An alternative solution is a septuplet, which is a default interpretation in the face of the absence of other indications. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||
b. 44
|
composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato
..
The grace note slashed in GE2 (→GE3) is an arbitrary revision. However, it is uncertain whether the notation of the earlier sources indicates a different performance, since Chopin would sometimes not carefully differentiate between both types of grace notes, particularly in the case of small quavers. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||||
b. 44
|
composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato
..
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||||
b. 50
|
composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato
..
FE feature accellerando (with doubled 'l') in this place. The mistake, certainly coming from Chopin (cf., e.g. the Impromptu in A category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Errors repeated in FE |
|||||||
b. 52
|
composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato
..
The change of the staccato mark is a frequent discretion of GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |