Page: 
Source: 
p. 2, b. 28-60
p. 1, b. 1-27
p. 2, b. 28-60
p. 3, b. 61-87
p. 4, b. 88-105
p. 5, b. 106-124
p. 6, b. 125-142
p. 7, b. 143-158
p. 8, b. 159-173
p. 9, b. 174-188
p. 10, b. 189-206
p. 11, b. 207-225
p. 12, b. 226-243
p. 13, b. 244-260
Main text
Main text
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FEO - Orda copy
FES - Stirling copy
FESf - Schiffmacher copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected reprint of EE1
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FEO - Orda copy
FES - Stirling copy
FESf - Schiffmacher copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected reprint of EE1
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 38-39

Slur to e2 in FE

Slur fo f2 in GE & EE2 (→EE3)

No slur in EE1

In FE one can see traces of proofreading of an earlier, inaccurate slur, encompassing four semiquavers only. This too short slur is present also in GE, which most probably means that the correction in FE was performed in the last stage of proofreading. The absence of the slur in EE1 resulted from the engraver's oversight, corrected in EE2 (→EE3), most probably on the basis of comparison with GE.

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions, Inaccuracies in GE, EE inaccuracies, Authentic corrections of FE

notation: Slurs

Missing markers on sources: FE1, FEO, FES, FESf, GE1, EE1, EE2, EE3