![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : GE revisions
b. 1-4
|
composition: Op. 19, Bolero
..
In EE the accents in the first four bars, just like in the practically entire piece, are short. It is an arbitrary change of the revisers. Long accents, most probably written by Chopin in [A], are present here only in FE. The first three accents of GE introduce a certain ambiguity, since their typeface is slightly different (they are narrower) than of the remaining marks in this source – perhaps they are also supposed to be interpreted as long. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 1-3
|
composition: Op. 19, Bolero
..
In FE there are no separate fermatas for the octaves in the L.H. The marks were added by the revisers of GE and EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 21
|
composition: Op. 19, Bolero
..
The dim. marking, placed between the arms of the category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 33
|
composition: Op. 19, Bolero
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 77
|
composition: Op. 19, Bolero
..
FE does not have an accidental before the last note in the bar. In this type of situations, Chopin generally considered the previous signs placed an octave lower to be binding (e.g. like in the case of the previous note, g category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in EE , GE revisions |