Issues : Annotations in FES
|
b. 154-155
|
composition: Op. 19, Bolero
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FES , Annotations in FEO |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
b. 160
|
composition: Op. 19, Bolero
..
We adopt a Chopinesque fingering written in pencil in FES to the main text. The last two digits are also in FEO. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FES , Annotations in FEO |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
b. 236
|
composition: Op. 19, Bolero
category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
b. 248-249
|
composition: Op. 19, Bolero
..
In the main text, we give the fingering written in pencil to FES (with one added digit for more clarity), coming most probably from Chopin. A different fingering, probably coming from Chopin, is in FESf. The poorly legible annotation in FEO may be interpreted in a variety of ways – we suggest these interpretations that lead to a pianistically natural fingering as variants. The fingering in EE comes from the editor and it is inauthentic. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Differences in fingering , Annotations in FES , Annotations in FEO , Annotations in FESf |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
b. 255
|
composition: Op. 19, Bolero
..
FE (→GE,EE) has a c category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Errors in GE , Terzverschreibung error , Annotations in FES |
2 as the 2nd semiquaver. It is a typical Terzverschreibung error of the engraver (or perhaps of Chopin in the Stichvorlage for