mUltimate Chopin

Op. 19, Bolero

Text Compare Notes Sources Description

Issues : EE revisions

b. 210-211

composition: Op. 19, Bolero

No sign in FE (→GE)

 in EE
 

[] suggested by the editors
 
..

We suggest adding a  hairpin, as it is in analogous bars 92-93. The mark was added, most probably by comparison with those bars, by the reviser of EE.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions

b. 214

composition: Op. 19, Bolero

No cresc. in FE (→EE1)

cresc. in GE & EE2 (→EE3)

Our variant suggestion
 
..

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions

b. 215

composition: Op. 19, Bolero

 

 in EE3

[] suggested by the editors
..

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions

b. 219-220

composition: Op. 19, Bolero

 
 
 
 

Our variant suggestion
..

We suggest adding characteristic accents, in accordance with the notation in analogous bar 107. The marks were probably added by the revisers of GE and EE. In EE2 (→EE3), in addition, the last accent was arbitrarily changed to a vertical one.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions

b. 225-227

composition: Op. 19, Bolero

 

No slur in GE & EE1 (→EE2)

Slur in EE3
 
..

In GE and EE, there is no little slur for the ending of the trill in bars 225 and 226-227. The missing slurs in GE could be justified by the fact that they were added only in the last proofreading of FE, whereas in EE it could have been an oversight of the engraver. In EE2, the reviser introduced slurs encompassing the main note and the ending of the trill, but only in bars 226-227. The slur in bar 225 was added in EE3.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , EE inaccuracies