Issues : Errors in EE
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »
b. 150
|
composition: Op. 19, Bolero
..
The version of FE (→EE1) with c2 in the ending of the trill is most probably erroneous. It is indicated by visible traces of removal of a before this note in FE and GE – c2 does not require any sign in this case, hence the was most probably printed by mistake, instead of , natural in this context. In this situation, removal of this sign in FE may be considered a result of either ordering of the notation of accidentals by the reviser or of Chopin's incompletely implemented proofreading, aiming at restoring . Therefore, in the main text we give the version of GE, in which the was replaced with a , perhaps by the composer himself. A double sharp was added also in EE2 (→EE3). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in EE |
|||
b. 255
|
composition: Op. 19, Bolero
..
FE (→GE,EE) has a c2 as the 2nd semiquaver. It is a typical Terzverschreibung error of the engraver (or perhaps of Chopin in the Stichvorlage for FE). Chopin corrected the erroneous note in pencil in FES. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Errors in GE , Terzverschreibung error , Annotations in FES |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »