Page: 
Source: 
p. 2, b. 33-69
p. 1, b. 1-32
p. 2, b. 33-69
p. 3, b. 70-92
p. 4, b. 93-112
p. 5, b. 113-136
p. 6, b. 137-170
p. 7, b. 171-195
p. 8, b. 196-220
p. 9, b. 221-240
p. 10, b. 241-260
p. 11, b. 261-280
p. 12, b. 281-308
p. 13, b. 309-334
p. 14, b. 335-366
p. 15, b. 367-398
p. 16, b. 399-424
p. 17, b. 425-445
p. 18, b. 446-466
p. 19, b. 467-487
p. 20, b. 488-514
Main text
Main text
½A - Semi-autograph
A - Autograph of the piano part
Morch - Manuscript of the orchestra part
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE1a - Retouched impression of GE1
GE2 - Second German edition
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Revised impression of EE1
EE3 - Corrected impression of EE2
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
½A - Semi-autograph
A - Autograph of the piano part
Morch - Manuscript of the orchestra part
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE1a - Retouched impression of GE1
GE2 - Second German edition
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Revised impression of EE1
EE3 - Corrected impression of EE2
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 54

A has an additional note, E, in the last crotchet in the L.H. It is almost certainly a mistake of the person writing certain fragments of Tutti in bold (see the characterization of A). Interestingly, the note is absent in the editions, although there are no traces of it having been deleted in GE1. It could mean that at the time when A served as base text for GE1, the fragments in bold type and the mistake were absent (it is not a conclusive argument, since the engraver could have simply confused the bars, printing the octave from bar 53).

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Foreign hand additions in manuscripts, Errors of A, Authentic corrections of GE

notation: Pitch

Missing markers on sources: A, Morch, GE1, GE1a, GE2, FE1, FE2, FED, FEJ, FES, EE1, EE2, EE3