Page: 
Source: 
p. 1, b. 1-32
p. 1, b. 1-32
p. 2, b. 33-69
p. 3, b. 70-92
p. 4, b. 93-112
p. 5, b. 113-136
p. 6, b. 137-170
p. 7, b. 171-195
p. 8, b. 196-220
p. 9, b. 221-240
p. 10, b. 241-260
p. 11, b. 261-280
p. 12, b. 281-308
p. 13, b. 309-334
p. 14, b. 335-366
p. 15, b. 367-398
p. 16, b. 399-424
p. 17, b. 425-445
p. 18, b. 446-466
p. 19, b. 467-487
p. 20, b. 488-514
EE1 - First English edition
Main text
½A - Semi-autograph
A - Autograph of the piano part
Morch - Manuscript of the orchestra part
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE1a - Retouched impression of GE1
GE2 - Second German edition
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Revised impression of EE1
EE3 - Corrected impression of EE2
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
½A - Semi-autograph
A - Autograph of the piano part
Morch - Manuscript of the orchestra part
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE1a - Retouched impression of GE1
GE2 - Second German edition
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Revised impression of EE1
EE3 - Corrected impression of EE2
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF EE1 - First English edition


  b. 29-32

4 long accents in A

 & different accents in GE1

 & long accents in FE

 & accents on 2nd beat in EE

4 short accents in GE2

The notation of accents in A is clear and unambiguous – four long accents on the 3rd beat of each of the bars. In spite of this, the editions did not faithfully reproduce both the placement and the length of the signs. All changes in GE1 and FE are undoubtedly of an accidental nature, which, with a tightly packed text, leads to confusion and impedes the interpretation and reproduction of their notation. Sometimes, the accents start so close to  that it seems that both signs constitute a pair, accenting one strike together (Chopin would often use such combinations, but in this case A excludes such understanding of these signs). In FE, such pairs were placed so inaccurately that in bars 30 and 32  signs seem to fall only on the 3rd beat of the bar. EE homogenised the notation of bars 30-32, considering the entire  pairs to be applying to the 2nd beat; the kind of employed accents is unobvious, but they are longer than, e.g. the signs in bars 24-26 and 28. GE2 reproduces the notation of A, only replacing long accents with short ones.
Similar ambiguities and distortions of notation are present also in bars 369-375.

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Long accents, EE revisions, Inaccuracies in GE, Inaccuracies in FE, GE revisions

notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

Missing markers on sources: A, Morch, GE1, GE1a, GE2, FE1, FE2, FED, FEJ, FES, EE1, EE2, EE3