Issues : Triplet slurs
b. 257-258
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In A, Chopin embraced this pair of bars with one slur, which he then clearly divided into two, in accordance with the slurring of similar pairs of bars in the three remaining fragments of this movement of the Concerto, built upon similar phrases (bars 177-182, 353-364 and 494-499). The fact that the division was not included in GE (→FE→EE) can be most probably explained by an arbitrary decision of the engraver of GE1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Authentic corrections of GE , Triplet slurs |
|||||||||
b. 293-297
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The slur visible in A under the quaver triplet in bars 293 and 297 was most probably overlooked both in GE1 and in GE2 (it is understandable in bar 293, in which the slur blends into the sign). We do not convey these slurs in the main text, since they seem to be triplet slurs, which we generally do not include (General Editorial Principles, p. 16), and which could have been left in A by accident. However, it is not a typical situation, hence it cannot be excluded that Chopin indeed envisaged double slurs in this place. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Triplet slurs |
|||||||||
b. 352
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text we give an extended slur – probably by Chopin together with adding the d2 note at the beginning of the bar – in the proofreading of FE (→EE). In turn, we omit the triplet slur added in GE (→FE→EE) – cf. General Editorial Principles, p. 16. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , Triplet slurs |