Issues : GE revisions
b. 101
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
It is uncertain whether the 2nd crotchet in the L.H. in A is provided with a staccato dot or not. In GE1 (→FE→EE) there is no dot; however, it was added in GE2. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||
b. 106-108
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
Out of two long accents under the chords in the left hand only the first was reproduced in GE1 (→FE→EE) and under the part of the R.H. EE added both accents in the L.H., probably by analogy with bars 90 and 92 and 114 and 116. GE2 restored the notation of A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||
b. 109
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |
||||||
b. 109
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The placement of the sign in A is almost certainly an example of the manner of placing indications within and not at the beginning of their scope of validity, sometimes used by Chopin – cf. e.g. 1st mov., bar 329. This is how it was interpreted already in GE1 (→FE→EE, →GE2). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Centrally placed marks |
||||||
b. 111
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources |