![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : GE revisions
b. 506
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The missing staccato dots over the 4th and 7th quavers in GE1 (→FE→EE) must be an oversight. The signs were added in GE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 506-510
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In the Chopinesque notation, the articulation markings placed over the part of the R.H. are binding also for the L.H. in this context. Due to this reason, we give this undoubtedly authentic notation of A in the main text. At the same time, it is consistent, since the passage in bars 503-505 also has a slur only over the R.H. On the other hand, the authenticity of the slurs and dots added in GE1 (→FE→EE) cannot be entirely excluded, since such separate markings for the L.H. were also sometimes used by Chopin. The fact that the markings appear at the beginning of the bar and not from the moment of the R.H. passing to the upper stave suggests, according to us, that the additions were performed by the reviser. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 507-509
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
Just like in bars 498-501, GE1 (→FE→EE) overlooked the dashes marking the range of the dynamic change. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 511-514
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
It is uncertain how the version of GE came to life, yet it is difficult to imagine that it could have come from Chopin in this form. This version was probably based on the conviction that the dynamics of the last chords has to be indicated in the piano part, too, which eventually led to the repetition of the markings written in Morch, not by Chopin. The completion of the piano part could have been ordered by the reviser, although one cannot exclude that the action could have been inspired by Chopin. In the second case, the composer probably had one category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||||
b. 514
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The version of FE (→EE) must be a mistake, perhaps a side effect of removing category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions |