Issues : FE revisions
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next »
b. 313
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The before the top note at the beginning of the bar in FE1 was overlooked. The mistake was corrected in FE2 (→EE). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , FE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 317
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text we adopt the newer form of this adverb, introduced in GE1 (we correct the erroneous 'o' at the end of the word to an 'e'). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Errors in GE , GE revisions , FE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 323
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The cautionary flat before b1 was added in the proofreading of FE (→EE) as well as in GE2. In the case of FE, one cannot exclude Chopin's intervention, although the revision of GE2 proves that such an addition could have also been performed by the reviser. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals , FE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 415-416
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
Three clearly long accents written in A were reproduced in GE1, without any apparent reason, in an explicitly varied manner. However, FE restored the notation of A, which could be seen as Chopin's proofreading. Both in EE and GE2 the Chopinesque long accents were reproduced as common short accents. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies , FE revisions |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next »