mUltimate Chopin

Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

Text Compare Notes Sources Description

Issues : FE revisions

b. 313

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

..

The  before the top note at the beginning of the bar in FE1 was overlooked. The mistake was corrected in FE2 (→EE).

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE , FE revisions

b. 317

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

leggieramente in A & GE2

leggiermente in GE1, contextual interpretation

leggieremente in FE

leggiero in EE
..

In the main text we adopt the newer form of this adverb, introduced in GE1 (we correct the erroneous 'o' at the end of the word to an 'e'). 

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , Errors in GE , GE revisions , FE revisions

b. 323

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

..

The cautionary flat before b1 was added in the proofreading of FE (→EE) as well as in GE2. In the case of FE, one cannot exclude Chopin's intervention, although the revision of GE2 proves that such an addition could have also been performed by the reviser.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals , FE revisions

b. 415-416

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

3 long accents in A & FE

2  & > in GE1

3 short accents in EE & GE2
..

Three clearly long accents written in A were reproduced in GE1, without any apparent reason, in an explicitly varied manner. However, FE restored the notation of A, which could be seen as Chopin's proofreading. Both in EE and GE2 the Chopinesque long accents were reproduced as common short accents.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies , FE revisions