Issues : EE revisions

b. 433

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

..

In A the notation of accidentals in this bar is inaccurate:

  • there is only one  before the 1st chord in the R.H.; moreover, it is written in such a way that one cannot be certain which note it concerns (we assume that it is d3),
  • in each of the triplets, a  is only before the 1st note,
  • no  before the bottom note of the third in the L.H. on the 3rd beat of the bar.

The necessary signs were added already in GE1 (→FE); however, the  before the bottom note of the octave in the L.H. at the beginning of the bar was overlooked. EE and GE2 feature the correct notation.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of A , Accidental below/above the note

b. 433

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Errors repeated in FE

b. 435-436

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

..

In A, Chopin wrote the final section of figuration in this phrase (from e2), as if he thought the majority of the previously introduced accidentals to be still valid – he put flats only before the 3rd and 7th quavers in bar 436. In the latter, signs were added in GE (→FEEE), yet the  at the end of the previous bar – only in EE

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Errors of A

b. 435

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

 in A (→GEFE)

  in EE

Our variant suggestion

..

The pedalling of A (→GEFE) is questionable in this bar. Initially, both this and the next bar had a whole-bar pedalling. Chopin then crossed out both signs in bar 436 and a  in the discussed bar 435. It is difficult to guess what a sole  mark left in this bar could mean in this context, hence it seems that Chopin committed a mistake: he either forgot to cross out the  mark or he unnecessarily crossed out the  mark. According to us, the latter option seems to be more plausible; therefore, in the main text we give a completed pedalling, written in brackets to signalise that its status is not entirely certain. EE added a  in accordance with the harmonic sense. 

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , No pedal release mark , Inaccuracies in A

b. 439

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

No mark in A (→GEFE)

Accent in EE

..

The accent added on the dminim in EE is most probably a revision (unification with the previous bars), although due to the similarity of the bars, a mistake cannot be excluded.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions