Issues : Inaccuracies in GE
|
b. 340
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The inclusion of the bottom note of the octave (F) to the solo part is certainly a result of a mistake of the engraver of GE1 (→FE→EE) who printed it in a font of a normal size. Chopin also contributed to the mistake, using a simplified, one-voice notation of this octave (differently than in bar 16). Cf. bars 30-32. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 352
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
Chopin's intention concerning the placement of the accent is uncertain. The change of its position in GE (→FE→EE) is almost certainly of a random nature, since in the version of A (→GE), in which there is a sole a category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||
|
b. 354
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
Shortened accents are a very frequent inaccuracy of GE, whereas the omission of the sign in FE is a patent mistake, revised then in EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||
|
b. 356
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
Omission of the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||
|
b. 356-362
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The clearly long accents in A in bars 356, 358 and 362 were inaccurately reproduced in GE (→FE→EE) as short. Cf. bar 360. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE |
2 at the beginning of the bar, it does not influence the meaning of this sign. After adding the d2 note in 
in 
