Issues : Errors in GE
b. 241-242
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The missing tie of g is certainly a mistake of GE1, corrected both in FE – perhaps by Chopin – and GE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||||
b. 246
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The missing hairpin is most probably a result of an oversight of the engraver of GE1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||||||||
b. 246-247
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The tie of g was misinterpreted in GE1 (→FE→EE) as combining the e1-g1 third in bar 246 with g in the following bar. GE2 restored the correct text. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 250-251
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 262-264
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In bars 252 and 264, A features clear accents on the second and penultimate quavers; such an accentuation scheme is repeated twice more in analogous bars. Therefore, omission of the 1st accent in bar 264 in GE1 (→FE→EE) must be a mistake. The accents in FE are placed inaccurately, hence in EE they were put a quaver earlier, on the 1st and 7th notes of the bar, which is a mistake. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in GE , EE inaccuracies |