data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
A
compare
According to us, the absence of the slur in the L.H. is a result of Chopin's oversight: a respective slur is present in all three similar places, in bars 423-424, 455-456 and 463-464.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Editorial revisions
notation: Slurs