mUltimate Chopin

Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Page: 
Source: 
p. 14, b. 220-230
p. 1, b. 1-22
p. 2, b. 23-49
p. 3, b. 50-76
p. 4, b. 77-92
p. 5, b. 93-104
p. 6, b. 105-114
p. 7, b. 115-124
p. 8, b. 125-140
p. 9, b. 141-153
p. 10, b. 154-168
p. 11, b. 169-180
p. 12, b. 181-204
p. 13, b. 205-219
p. 14, b. 220-230
p. 15, b. 231-240
p. 16, b. 241-250
p. 17, b. 251-267
p. 18, b. 268-286
p. 19, b. 287-298
p. 20, b. 299-313
p. 21, b. 314-327
p. 22, b. 328-348
Main text
Main text
½A - Semi-autograph
A - Autograph of the piano part
Morch - Manuscript of the orchestra part
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE1a - Retouched impression of GE1
GE2 - Second German edition
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Revised impression of EE1
EE3 - Corrected impression of EE2
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
½A - Semi-autograph
A - Autograph of the piano part
Morch - Manuscript of the orchestra part
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE1a - Retouched impression of GE1
GE2 - Second German edition
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Revised impression of EE1
EE3 - Corrected impression of EE2
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text

  b. 229

No slur in A (→GE→FE)

Slur in EE

Slur suggested by the editors

Taking into account the authentic slur in analogous bar 225, one can consider that the missing slur in this bar should be added – this was probably the reasoning of the reviser of EE. On the other hand, it cannot be excluded that Chopin consciously resigned from writing separate slurs for the L.H. in similar figurations – cf. the note in bar 227. In the main text we suggest a slur for the L.H. mainly due to a necessary, according to us, addition of the slur in bars 231-232. 

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions

notation: Slurs

Missing markers on sources: GE1, A, GE1a, Morch, GE2, FE1, FE2, FES, FED, FEJ, EE1, EE2, EE3
Complete ➔