mUltimate Chopin

Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Page: 
Source: 
p. 1, b. 1-22
p. 1, b. 1-22
p. 2, b. 23-49
p. 3, b. 50-76
p. 4, b. 77-92
p. 5, b. 93-104
p. 6, b. 105-114
p. 7, b. 115-124
p. 8, b. 125-140
p. 9, b. 141-153
p. 10, b. 154-168
p. 11, b. 169-180
p. 12, b. 181-204
p. 13, b. 205-219
p. 14, b. 220-230
p. 15, b. 231-240
p. 16, b. 241-250
p. 17, b. 251-267
p. 18, b. 268-286
p. 19, b. 287-298
p. 20, b. 299-313
p. 21, b. 314-327
p. 22, b. 328-348
Main text
Main text
½A - Semi-autograph
A - Autograph of the piano part
Morch - Manuscript of the orchestra part
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE1a - Retouched impression of GE1
GE2 - Second German edition
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Revised impression of EE1
EE3 - Corrected impression of EE2
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
½A - Semi-autograph
A - Autograph of the piano part
Morch - Manuscript of the orchestra part
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE1a - Retouched impression of GE1
GE2 - Second German edition
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Revised impression of EE1
EE3 - Corrected impression of EE2
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text

  b. 4

Short accent in A (literal reading→GE→FE→EE)

Long accent in A, contextual interpretation

In A, one can have doubts concerning the type of accent Chopin wanted to use. According to us, in this context a long accent is more likely.

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Long accents

notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

Missing markers on sources: GE1, A, GE1a, Morch, GE2, FE1, FE2, FES, FED, FEJ, EE1, EE2, EE3
Complete ➔