![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Page:
Source:
p. 21, b. 314-327
Main text
Prezentacja
Select
![](/build/images/x_button.png)
![]() |
![]() |
Two-bar slur in A, interpretation suggested by the editors |
![]() |
![]() |
In A bar 321 is the last one on the page, which became the cause of the ambiguous notation of the slurs in the R.H. – the slur in bar 322 (on a new page) suggests a continuation from the previous bar, which is not confirmed by the ending of the slur in bar 321. In the main text we assume that Chopin's intention was a two-bar slur, yet the version of the editions, with two one-bar slurs, can also be considered a justified interpretation of A.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources
issues: Inaccurate slurs in A
notation: Slurs
Missing markers on sources:
GE1, A, GE1a, Morch, GE2, FE1, FE2, FES, FED, FEJ, EE1, EE2, EE3