|
|
in the sources |
|
|
No marking in FED, possible reading |
In FED, 
is crossed by a slightly diagonal line, which can be interpreted as a deletion. However, the meaning of the dash is not certain – in Chopin pupils' copies, there are fragments containing such delicate dashes, drawn probably when discussing problematic places for the pupil. Most frequently, the dashes are of no specific meaning; they simply prove a more intense work on a given fragment.
It is also unclear what a possible deletion could mean. If not then 
? Or maybe 
that was valid before the said ? In the face of these doubts, we suggest the absence of , being a result of a possible deletion, only as one of possible interpretations of FED.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Source & stylistic information
issues: Annotations in teaching copies, Annotations in FED
notation: Verbal indications