![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Page:
Source:
p. 36, b. 181-185
Morch - Manuscript of the orchestra part
Prezentacja
Select
![](/build/images/x_button.png)
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
In A is written in such a way that it is unclear whether it is to be valid from the first or 2nd quaver in the bar. Both versions can be justified, as far as music is concerned:
-
in the orchestra part – Morch –
is certainly valid from the beginning of the bar, hence it seems to be natural that it is to be placed in the same way in A;
-
the first quaver in this bar belongs still to the solo part and it has to be performed
as such; the piano reduction of the orchestra part begins only from the 2nd quaver and
is to be applied from this place.
According to us, the second reasoning is more convincing. The absence of in GE1 (→FE→EE) is probably an oversight, since the adjacent accent was overlooked too.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: Errors in GE, GE revisions
notation: Verbal indications
Missing markers on sources:
GE1, A, GE1a, Morch, GE2, FE1, FE2, FES, FED, FEJ, EE1, EE2, EE3