Issues : Annotations in FED
b. 31
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Annotations in FED |
||||||||
b. 41
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The natural before the initial third was misplaced in FE: before c1 instead of a. The mistake went to EE1, where the "superfluous" sign was omitted. Chopin added the necessary sign in FED; EE2 (→EE3) also includes the correct text. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Annotations in FED , Errors in EE |
||||||||
b. 59
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
 
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Annotations in FED , Terzverschreibung error |
||||||||
b. 72
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
b. 73-74
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The hairpin added in FED questions the validity of other dynamic signs in this place. The sign concerns the major part of the area of validity of , present in all sources. One melodic line cannot be performed both crescendo and diminuendo at the same time, hence we have to assume that the added sign replaces the printed one, although the latter was not deleted. Perhaps we should also reject after which performing the ascending line seems to be problematic. Taking into account the above doubts, in the main text we leave the version of A and of the remaining sources, while in the version of FED we omit and we leave the inclusion of to the discretion of the performer. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources |