![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Errors in GE
b. 265
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
One could be looking for Chopin's proofreading in category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||
b. 265-266
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
There are neither traces of removal nor reasons to remove the accents in the proofreading of GE1, hence their absence is most probably an oversight. The signs were restored in GE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 266
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The absence of c2 in the chords is almost certainly a result of an oversight of the engraver of GE1 (→FE→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 271
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 271
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |