Issues : Errors in GE
|
b. 204
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The missing tie of e category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 205
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The missing tie of e category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 207
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
Missing dots in the majority of the editions are a result of inaccuracy of the engraver of GE1 (→FE→EE). The signs were added in GE2. Moreover, in GE the accent was reproduced as short, whereas in FE (→EE1) it was completely overlooked. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 209
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In GE (→FE) the entire chord was erroneously printed with notes of a normal size. The mistake was not repeated in EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in GE |
|||||||||
|
b. 211
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In the editions (except GE2), the solo piano phrase in bars 209-210 is written with an octave sign. In GE1 (→FE→EE1) the dashes marking its range are erroneously led until the f2 minim in bar 211; there is also no loco indication following them. As a result, when interpreted literally, the minim is an f3, although in this context it is easy to see a mistake. In spite of this, in GE2, in which the entire phrase was written without an octave sign (as in our main text), the minim in bar 211 was also moved an octave higher, at the same time confirming its erroneous pitch. In EE2 (→EE3) the range of the octave sign was marked correctly. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
1 tied in 
