Page:
Source:
p. 8, b. 161-192
Main text
Prezentacja
Select
b. 181-184
The slur of GE must be erroneous; the reason a significant part thereof was overlooked could have been an inaccurate notation of GC – the slur is written so low that it almost touches the R.H. slur in the next line.
Compare the passage in the sources»
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: Errors in GE, Inaccuracies in GC
notation: Slurs
Missing markers on sources:
FE1, FE2, FE3, FE4, FESch, FED, FES, GE1, GE2, GC, EE1, EE2