mUltimate Chopin

Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Page: 
Source: 
p. 3, b. 49-72
p. 1, b. 1-24
p. 2, b. 25-48
p. 3, b. 49-72
p. 4, b. 73-92
p. 5, b. 93-120
p. 6, b. 121-140
p. 7, b. 141-160
p. 8, b. 161-192
p. 9, b. 193-214
p. 10, b. 215-241
Main text
Main text
GC - Gutmann's Copy
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Second impression of FE
FE3 - Third impression of FE
FE4 - Fourth impression of FE
FESch - Scherbatoff Copy
FES - Stirling copy
FED - Dubois copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Corrected reprint of GE
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Revised impression of EE
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
GC - Gutmann's Copy
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Second impression of FE
FE3 - Third impression of FE
FE4 - Fourth impression of FE
FESch - Scherbatoff Copy
FES - Stirling copy
FED - Dubois copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Corrected reprint of GE
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Revised impression of EE
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link Main text

  b. 64

No staccato dot in GC (→GE)

Staccato dot in FE (→EE)

The absence of this mark is most probably an oversight of the copyist, repeated in GE. It is also the notation of the slur in this bar (the adjacent note) that is linked to it.

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors of GC

notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

Missing markers on sources: FE1, FE2, FE3, FE4, FESch, FED, FES, GE1, GE2, GC, EE1, EE2
Complete ➔