Page: 
Source: 
p. 6, b. 166-203
p. 1, b. 1-31
p. 2, b. 32-73
p. 3, b. 74-111
p. 4, b. 112-138
p. 5, b. 139-165
p. 6, b. 166-203
p. 7, b. 204-241
FE1 - First French edition
Main text
GC - Gutmann's Copy
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Second impression of FE
FE3 - Third impression of FE
FE4 - Fourth impression of FE
FESch - Scherbatoff Copy
FES - Stirling copy
FED - Dubois copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Corrected reprint of GE
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Revised impression of EE
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
GC - Gutmann's Copy
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Second impression of FE
FE3 - Third impression of FE
FE4 - Fourth impression of FE
FESch - Scherbatoff Copy
FES - Stirling copy
FED - Dubois copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Corrected reprint of GE
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Revised impression of EE
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF FE1 - First French edition

Original in: Bibliothèque Nationale de France, Paris


  b. 170-172

Two slurs in GC

Tenuto slur in FE (→EE)

One slur in GE

The slurs in GC are written neglectfully, hence their meaning is unobvious – GE regarded them as parts of one slur. In the main text we give the slur of FE, displaying a characteristic, prolonged tenuto ending, analogous to the slur in the next phrase.

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE, Inaccuracies in GC, Tenuto slurs

notation: Slurs

Missing markers on sources: FESch, FED, FES, GC